Thursday, June 18, 2015
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
almost there, well, nope.
from n.talib, to d.kahneman, to j.soloveitchik, how cool are kahneman's heuristics ?!...and then to: to d.hoffman with the basis of perception-based (of reality), being driven to extinction vs fitness-based, thriving. Are 'accurate perceptions' of any value?
then there's p.lazarsfeld's probabilistic nature of interrelations between latent variables and their indicators... (like cherry-picking 'reason/cause' once an even has come and gone, doe! soup7!) is this not, simply: hindsight is 20:20, -which gives "hindsight is 'not' 20:20".
“Everything of importance has been said before by somebody who did not discover it.”
― Alfred North Whitehead
why do we prioritize 'bad news'?
and here's the thing... my kids have questions about xyz, and i'm thinking, for me, i know, for you- i do not know... figure it out for yourself. and as a teacher, i have kids that do 'not' even ask about xyz even after autumn weaver's bell ringer- so then what? (a standardized test?)
then there's p.lazarsfeld's probabilistic nature of interrelations between latent variables and their indicators... (like cherry-picking 'reason/cause' once an even has come and gone, doe! soup7!) is this not, simply: hindsight is 20:20, -which gives "hindsight is 'not' 20:20".
“Everything of importance has been said before by somebody who did not discover it.”
― Alfred North Whitehead
why do we prioritize 'bad news'?
and here's the thing... my kids have questions about xyz, and i'm thinking, for me, i know, for you- i do not know... figure it out for yourself. and as a teacher, i have kids that do 'not' even ask about xyz even after autumn weaver's bell ringer- so then what? (a standardized test?)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)